This post went viral due to the ongoing debate about AI's role in creative fields, especially within Korea's booming web novel industry. The swift debunking of the exaggerated claim resonated with many who are skeptical of fully automated AI content generation.
AI 딸깍으로 자동 사냥이 가능하다는 사람이 등장함.
애초에 플랫폼 시스템이 어떻게 돌아가는지도 모르는 AI 만능론 정신병자의 넋두리였던게 걸려서 글삭 빤스런 쳤다고 함.
진짜 AI로 글쌀먹하겠다고 온갖 몸비틀기 하는 놈들이 보기엔 너무 식상해서 재미없는 어그로였다고 평가함.
🇰🇷 KOREAN REACTIONS 10
It's one spoon of AI 'ddalkkak' and one spoon of the author's hard work diligently revising the story development while reading it.
There are many novels suspected of being AI-generated. But their characteristic is that they can't be long-term serialized. Around 100 chapters, the story and plausibility completely break down. So I only follow established authors, or if it's a new author, I only follow novels that have been serialized for 200-300+ chapters and have good reviews.
Making anything sound and look plausible with AI takes just 30 minutes of 'ddalkkak,' so it seems more people are stopping at that level, faking it, and feeding their vanity.
If an era comes where you can 'ssalmeok' writing web novels with AI, that would be AGI (Artificial General Intelligence). There are tons of people who read 100,000 characters of web novels a day; their eyes are more accurate than those who filter AI art.
Uh... I write novels I like with AI, though I openly announced I use AI.
Aren't people already doing 'ddalkkak-seukseuk' (click-and-swipe, meaning quick edits)?
Writing with AI and having a person edit/revise is already being done well here and there.
If it really worked, they wouldn't have posted about it (they'd be too busy making money).
In about 1-2 years, it might actually be possible with just a 'ddalkkak'...
Actually, that happens with human-written novels too...